Recent News
the future
Impact of Cultures on Aesthetics & Design
To Control or Be Controlled
Archives
- November 2007
- October 2007
- April 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
December 2004 Archives
December 14, 2004
Math, math, math. Much about the creation of an EE is finding the little math genie within each of them. It has been said that a Control EE skirts the edge of existence as a Mathematician. If so, one must have an affinity for the very slippery concepts presented to us as Control Theory and enjoy differential equations. That is very true should one want to resolve complex matrix operations that define a closed systems driving constants, say Kp, Ki, or Kd (proportional, integral, derivative). There must be an easier way for the remaining mortals amongst us.
Let me introduce you to my little friend, the Open-Loop Response...
Continue reading "To Control or Be Controlled"December 20, 2004
Values within countries, linked by language and religion, move from survival to postmodern with a rise in GDP and subsequent political stability. Will personal aesthetics change at a parallel rate? How will cultures with large income disparity choose to integrate aesthetics and design within their social agendas? (see International Herald Tribune article on Design in India, Dec. 19, 2004).
Continue reading "Impact of Cultures on Aesthetics & Design"December 22, 2004
"Why didn't anyone ever think of that before?"
In 2025, will we still be asking that question? Of course we will.
Today, everything has a chip. Some chips actually think, albeit at a first-grade level and with little common sense. Others identify products to comply with the Recycling Reclaim Act of 2018. Some even carry out tasks, replacing low-wage jobs and freeing up personal time.
Designs are judged on many criteria, not just beauty or innovation: the advantage to the user, the extended life of the manufacture, the reclaim advantage, morph opportunities, transformational prowess, internal power generation capability and the benefit to society, just to name a few. But let's face it, good design is subjective. It's not easily rationalized.
In 2025, good design solutions are the rule rather than the exception. Since MicrosoftWal-Mart? created its "design first" policy, the bar has been raised. Forty or 50 years ago, we didn't have Linux's Great Design Software to identify consumer demographics and pair future scenarios with the data. Today's products are designed around the specific emotional needs of the targeted user, as well as their aesthetic and functional desires. Great design is pretty easy to create. Look at Vietnam: It has won more IDEAs (major design awards) in the last 15 years than all other countries combined! But be careful, a basketful of silvers and bronzes doesn't define design excellence. It is great sustainable design that takes the gold....
Continue reading "the future"