Recent News
Top Ten Reasons Why Your Company is not Innovative
New Product Shopping Simulations
Some thoughts on Meaningful Ethnography
Tom Tjaarda on Creativity
Take a Look - An American Look
Open Innovation
Archives
- November 2007
- October 2007
- April 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
April 11, 2007
Some thoughts on Meaningful Ethnography
posted by at 9:27 AM
By Martha Cotton - Vice President of Research for Herbst LaZar Bell
I’ve been doing this a while—by “this” I mean ethnographic research in a business setting. Throughout my career I’ve experienced many ups and downs in terms of having to justify my existence and stay relevant as an ethnographer to my business colleagues and my clients. But, I would say in the past 2-3 years there has been a noticeable shift in the general acceptance of ethnography as a valid approach to solving business and design problems. In short, ethnography has moved mainstream, which is a very exciting development.
Now, you’d think that would be good for people like me. And it is, from a personal career advancement perspective, to the kind of budgets I now get to play with. All good. However, as ethnography is done more and more, especially by less experienced practitioners, it is frequently done less and less well. This is not so good.
Now, my concern here is not about “who” does ethnography—who the “real ethnographers” are. This comes up far too often at our professional conferences. In my mind, such debates are a waste of precious intellectual energy, and are completely non-productive. I believe that the current excitement in and about our field comes from providing relevance to many and varied disciplines, which means that individuals from many and varied disciplines can become qualified ethnographic practitioners, each bringing a unique perspective.
No, what concerns me about the growing “buzz” around ethnography is the un-meaningful choices some clients and some practitioners make for the reasons to do ethnography, and the outputs to expect from ethnography.
To me, the biggest issue is that when ethnography is done less well, our clients grow to expect less from it. This degrades the entire practice for all of us.
I frequently talk to clients who don’t know what kind of value they should ultimately expect from their ethnography investments. What I say to them is: expect more meaning from ethnography—more meaningful expressions of patterns of behavior and what it means for your business; more meaningful expression of the “native categories” consumers/end-users create and what it means for your business; more meaningful “thick descriptions” of human experience and what that means for your business. And clients should expect more from ethnographic research outputs: more frameworks to help them think through their challenges; more insight about experience in the aggregate rather than connected to single voices; more insight that is directly relevant to their objectives; more dynamic deliverables that will live beyond a presentation. More!
Think about what you want to get out of ethnography, and then expect more from it.
